Yes, oppression and suppression is a reality of the world we live in today. But have you noticed the kind of people that are representing the oppressed and the oppressors? How come these individuals don't call out to my human nature? How come I'm not tantalized by their words? How is thug behaviour looting and killing part of the most beautiful part of human beliefs? Call me crazy but I just think that before you pick up the banner of peace you must look upon yourself to make sure all the pieces of your faith fit together.
Who speaks for the mother seeking food for her young? Who calls out to feed the millions of hungry souls? Yes some do, but those calls never get the same publicity as these religious feuds, do they? I'm not going to act like an expert on the world because I am no where near anything resembling an activist or a game changer. But I do know my place, I do know that before I tell anyone to quit sugar I must quite it myself. If I'm asking for someone to treat my faith with respect, first I must stop thinking of them as foul infidels. Rhetoric has never been a very good friend of mine, but the thing is that the collective human conscious is linked to this thought, and this is the key to peace in the world today in my opinion.
The energy you feel from a strong faithful endeavour is hard to contain sometimes, believe me I know. But it is just that action which will make you a true believer. If you can contain the raging sea of emotions inside of you, then rest assured you will be able to appeal to more individuals and masses then you've ever dreamed of. These teachings, these concepts are not new; they are not my discovery but they have been there for centuries and centuries. Every single time we are confronted with the choice between patience and violence; as a mass as a bigger group we often pick the wrong actions. Why is mass mentality so close to animal behaviour? Aren't two heads supposed to be better then one? The truth is that when you see an angry mob, it usually consists of the the opinion of one angry individual. That opinion could be hypocritical, it could be selfish or even totally opposite of the faiths involved but I guess we just love having violent shepherds rather than the ones truly intended for us.
Who speaks for the mother seeking food for her young? Who calls out to feed the millions of hungry souls? Yes some do, but those calls never get the same publicity as these religious feuds, do they? I'm not going to act like an expert on the world because I am no where near anything resembling an activist or a game changer. But I do know my place, I do know that before I tell anyone to quit sugar I must quite it myself. If I'm asking for someone to treat my faith with respect, first I must stop thinking of them as foul infidels. Rhetoric has never been a very good friend of mine, but the thing is that the collective human conscious is linked to this thought, and this is the key to peace in the world today in my opinion.
The energy you feel from a strong faithful endeavour is hard to contain sometimes, believe me I know. But it is just that action which will make you a true believer. If you can contain the raging sea of emotions inside of you, then rest assured you will be able to appeal to more individuals and masses then you've ever dreamed of. These teachings, these concepts are not new; they are not my discovery but they have been there for centuries and centuries. Every single time we are confronted with the choice between patience and violence; as a mass as a bigger group we often pick the wrong actions. Why is mass mentality so close to animal behaviour? Aren't two heads supposed to be better then one? The truth is that when you see an angry mob, it usually consists of the the opinion of one angry individual. That opinion could be hypocritical, it could be selfish or even totally opposite of the faiths involved but I guess we just love having violent shepherds rather than the ones truly intended for us.